Lawmakers in Washington state are reviewing a new bill that would place limits on how artificial intelligence is used in public schools. The proposal aims to protect students from harmful or unfair decisions made by automated systems without human oversight.
The bill, known as Senate Bill 5956, focuses on regulating what are called automated decision systems. These systems include software that uses data, predictions, or classifications to guide decisions. Lawmakers say these tools are becoming more common in schools, often without clear rules.
The bill sets out six main restrictions. One key rule would stop schools from using artificial intelligence as the only reason for student discipline. This means AI systems could not be the sole factor behind suspensions, expulsions, or other serious actions.
Another restriction would prevent schools from removing students from class, referring them to law enforcement, or sending them to alternative education settings based only on AI predictions or surveillance data. Any such decision would require a human review and a full look at the situation.
The bill would also ban the use of AI systems to create risk scores or predictive labels for individual students. Supporters say these scores can unfairly label students and follow them for years. The proposal also stops schools from keeping internal watchlists created by automated systems.
In addition, schools would not be allowed to sign contracts with vendors that permit these banned practices. This rule aims to hold technology companies accountable and prevent harmful tools from entering classrooms through third-party contracts.
One of the most sensitive areas covered by the bill involves biometric data. The proposal would ban the use of biometric tools to guess or label a student’s emotions, mental health, sexual orientation, gender identity, or other personal traits. Lawmakers say these practices raise serious privacy and safety concerns.
Supporters of the bill say technology is advancing faster than school policies. They argue that guardrails are needed to ensure students are treated fairly. A major concern is that automated systems may increase existing inequalities in education.
Lawmakers backing the bill say some AI tools can reflect bias in the data they use. This could lead to certain student groups being flagged more often than others. They warn that students of color, students with disabilities, and other protected groups could face unfair treatment.
Recent incidents in other states have raised alarms about AI use in school security. In some cases, automated systems have mistaken everyday objects for weapons. These errors led to students being restrained or schools being locked down for hours.
Education advocates say such false alarms can cause fear and emotional harm. They argue that students should not face serious consequences based on machine errors. They stress that young people should feel safe at school, not watched or judged by flawed systems.
Supporters of the bill make clear that it does not ban artificial intelligence in schools. Instead, it requires that humans remain responsible for final decisions. AI may provide data or alerts, but people must review the information and apply judgment.
Education leaders say this balance allows schools to use helpful technology while protecting student rights. They believe AI can support learning and safety when used carefully and responsibly.
During the bill’s first public hearing, supporters spoke in favor of the proposal. No formal opposition was presented at that time. Lawmakers will continue to review the bill as it moves through the legislative process.
If passed, the bill would make Washington one of the first states to clearly define limits on AI decision-making in public schools. Supporters say the measure could serve as a model for other states facing similar challenges.
As artificial intelligence becomes more common in education, lawmakers say clear rules are needed. Senate Bill 5956 reflects growing concern that student safety, privacy, and fairness must come before speed or convenience.
The debate is expected to continue in upcoming sessions, with educators, parents, and technology experts watching closely.
